Error loading page.
Try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, there may be a network issue, and you can use our self test page to see what's preventing the page from loading.
Learn more about possible network issues or contact support for more help.

Creativity without Law

Challenging the Assumptions of Intellectual Property

ebook
1 of 1 copy available
1 of 1 copy available

Behind the scenes of the many artists and innovators flourishing beyond the bounds of intellectual property laws
Intellectual property law, or IP law, is based on certain assumptions about creative behavior. The case for regulation assumes that creators have a fundamental legal right to prevent copying, and without this right they will under-invest in new work. But this premise fails to fully capture the reality of creative production. It ignores the range of powerful non-economic motivations that compel creativity, and it overlooks the capacity of creative industries for self-governance and innovative social and market responses to appropriation.
This book reveals the on-the-ground practices of a range of creators and innovators. In doing so, it challenges intellectual property orthodoxy by showing that incentives for creative production often exist in the absence of, or in disregard for, formal legal protections. Instead, these communities rely on evolving social norms and market responses—sensitive to their particular cultural, competitive, and technological circumstances—to ensure creative incentives. From tattoo artists to medical researchers, Nigerian filmmakers to roller derby players, the communities illustrated in this book demonstrate that creativity can thrive without legal incentives, and perhaps more strikingly, that some creative communities prefer, and thrive, in environments defined by self-regulation rather than legal rules.
Beyond their value as descriptions of specific industries and communities, the accounts collected here help to ground debates over IP policy in the empirical realities of the creative process. Their parallels and divergences also highlight the value of rules that are sensitive to the unique mix of conditions and motivations of particular industries and communities, rather than the monoculture of uniform regulation of the current IP system.

  • Creators

  • Publisher

  • Release date

  • Formats

  • Languages

  • Reviews

    • Library Journal

      February 1, 2017

      Patents and copyrights in American law are predicated on a utilitarian bargain: the law gives exclusive rights to creators in order to spur them to be productive and allow the public to benefit from the things they make. The corporate copyright interests continue to demand more and more exclusive rights at the expense of the public, claiming that only stronger protections for owners can ensure that new works are created. For example, even though dress designs are not protected in law, we get changing fashions constantly, yet the industry argues for expanding copyright law. This collection of essays by academics--mostly law professors--edited by Darling (research specialist, MIT Media Lab) and Perzanowski (law, Case Western Reserve Univ. Sch. of Law; coauthor, The End of Ownership) challenges the assumption that legal protections are needed to spur creativity. Each essay is an empirical look at several industries and how they respond to the lack of legal protections; e.g., recipes cannot be copyrighted, so chefs use peer pressure against unattributed copying. VERDICT An excellent collection of case studies and valuable contribution to the debate on copyright law.--Michael O. Eshleman, Lebanon, OH

      Copyright 2017 Library Journal, LLC Used with permission.

Formats

  • Kindle Book
  • OverDrive Read
  • EPUB ebook

Languages

  • English

Loading